SECRETARY'S
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REGULATORY REFORM REGIONAL HEARING #3
MEETING MINUTES/SUMMARY
April
17, 2002
Ramada Plaza Suites & Conference Center
Philadelphia Room
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
9:03
A.M. Dr. DOUGLAS Wood calls the meeting to order
Dr.
Wood, the Committee chair, encouraged the days speakers to provide
their ideas for solutions, not just descriptions of problems.
9:05
A.M. Rural Issues
Marcia
Brand, HRSA
Ms.
Brand, director of the Office of Rural Health Policy, said rural areas,
defined for some purposes as areas with fewer than 50,000 people, have
one-fifth of the nations population. Rural residents are
disproportionately elderly. Fewer health care providers are available to
them, the hospitals they use are smaller, and they are more likely to be
uninsured than urban and suburban dwellers. The Office of Rural Health
Policy was created in 1987, and it often deals with the "unintended
consequences" of national policy decisions. A recent Rural Task Force
in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) found that small-town
mayors and administrators had trouble figuring out where to access the HHS
bureaucracy, and the department is working to create clearer rural
liaisons. Current initiatives include a "flex" grant program for
critical-access hospitals, a capital program to refurbish hospitals,
payment increases for community health centers and core service providers,
tele-health and distance learning programs, and pilot grants to small
hospitals.
Tom
Hoyer, CMS
Mr.
Hoyer said the government has been coming to terms with rural health needs
gradually over the last 30 years. When Medicare was enacted as a national
program, it was intended to be the same everywhere with cost-based
reimbursement. The introduction of prospective payment for hospitals in
1983 did not particularly suit rural areas. By the late 1990s, legislation
began to address rural needs specifically, with attention to
critical-access hospitals, rural payment, and tele-medicine. In an effort
to work better with rural providers, regional offices of the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) now have rural health coordinators,
and Administrator Tom Scully has begun an "open-door" process to
vet issues. Current issues include payment, the burden of regulation on
small facilities, use of Minimum Data Set (MDS) data, rules governing the
use of physician assistants and nurse anesthetists, storage of medical
records, uniform surveys for critical-access hospitals, and special rules
for entities that are both hospitals and home health agencies.
9:30
a.m. Introduction to open-door forum (telephone call-in)
Tim
Trysla, CMS
Mr.
Trysla talked about CMS Administrator Tom Scullys open-door meetings.
Current issues include the burden of Emergency Medical Treatment and
Active Labor Act (EMTALA) regulations on small facilities, cost reports,
how "sole providers" are affected when "like"
providers exist within 35 miles, the ability of rural hospitals to get
provider numbers for their weekend contract physicians, staff status as
independent contractors vs. employees, and the 855B process. CMSs
open-door initiative is an effort to compensate for the fact that rural
hospitals do not have the resources to hire consultants and lobbyists to
influence and interpret CMS regulations.
9:38
A.M. The committee joined the Rural issues conference call in proGRess
Issues
discussed included survey rules on waiting rooms; the role of "allied
health professionals" (physician assistants and nurse practitioners);
difficulties rural hospitals face in getting provider numbers for their
temporary and locum tenens doctors; tele-medicine; operating hours
for rural clinics; secondary payer forms; and advance beneficiary notices
(ABNs).
10:05
a.m. Break
10:20
a.M. Provider and Beneficiary Perspectives
Robert
Harman, Grant Memorial Hospital
Petersburg, West Virginia
Mr.
Harman, a hospital administrator, said West Virginia hospitals are in
financial trouble, with rising costs and inadequate reimbursement for care
such as delivering babies. Proposed home health cuts will hit rural
providers hard. Rural areas have high rates of uninsured people relying on
charity care, as well as high rates of disease. His recommendations
include releasing regulations in a coordinated fashion, factoring the cost
of implementation into payments, limiting data collection for the Outcome
and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) to payment-related items,
eliminating redundant consent requirements in the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations, giving providers a
HIPAA exemption for "incidental" disclosures of information, and
relaxing HIPAAs business associate requirements. Other recommendations
include providing more J-1 visas for foreign doctors to serve rural areas,
increasing payment for critical ambulance services (and switching to a
cost-based system), and tort reform for malpractice cases.
Tim
Size, Rural Wisconsin Cooperative
Sauk City, Wisconsin
Mr.
Size, executive director of the cooperative, talked about Secretary Tommy
Thompsons efforts as Governor of Wisconsin to simplify regulations for
rural areas. He recommended institutionalizing the rural task force and
open-door process within CMS to allow rural providers to comment on new
legislation and regulations; disaggregating all health data to study the
particular needs of rural areas; doing a rural impact analysis on all new
regulations; more research on best practices for rural areas; and
fundamentally changing the prospective payment system in rural areas to
reflect labor market costs and the higher rates of cost-shifting across
payers.
Dr.
Wayne Myers
Maine
Dr.
Myers, a pediatrician and former director of the Office of Rural Health
Policy, said simple laboratory tests like a blood count should not require
a diagnosis code, so that doctors dont have to second guess their real
diagnosis in order to get paid. This is particularly difficult as
different fiscal intermediaries, labs and hospitals all have different
diagnosis requirements. Rural hospitals rely heavily on foreign doctors
under the J-1 visa program, and they could better use nurse practitioners
for ambulatory care. More rural health policy research is needed to
identify provider models that work well there. Congress often punts rural
issues to the Secretary of HHS, and its difficult for rural providers
to navigate multiple layers of the agency to get their needs heard. The
Office for Rural Health Policy should be given standing to work out all
waivers and exceptions of regulations for rural areas.
Dr.
Mona Counts, Primary Care Center of Mt. Morris
Mt. Morris, Pennsylvania
Dr.
Counts, a nurse practitioner, said nurse practitioners need to be
recognized as providers under Medicare Part A for hospice and home health
work. There should be a universal application for credentialing, rather
than the current system where nurse practitioners must re-apply in
different states for billing purposes. Rural organizations need outreach
and technical assistance to help them write grants and secure funding from
already available programs.
Raymond
Bahl, Apprise Counselor
Pennsylvania
Mr.
Bahl talked about Apprise, a volunteer program that helps seniors get
information on Medicare, Medicaid, Medigap, long-tem care, and
Medicare+Choice (M+C) options, as well as how to navigate the appeals
process and the paperwork. The lack of a Medicare prescription drug
benefit is the main problem seniors are talking about. They wonder why
drugs are cheaper in Canada and why only some seniors qualify for drug
company discounts. Medigap providers are not clearly explaining the
difference between "issue age" and "attained age" in
the contracts. The Medicare summary of benefits notice is confusing when
it says "THIS IS NOT A BILL," but you may be responsible for the
charges.
Q&A
The
committee and the panel discussed tele-medicine and inter-state barriers
that arise; HIPAA business associate requirements; beneficiaries who are
not helped by means-tested programs; the evolution of rural advocacy in
federal health policymaking; and community-based care delivery models.
10:35
a.m. public comment
Paul
Smith,
a former durable medical equipment provider, said carrier audits drove him
out of business, but that the U.S. Attorney declined to prosecute him for
Medicare fraud after years of scrutiny. Carriers are arrogant,
condescending and confrontational, he said, and they base recoupment on an
extrapolation from a small audit sample. Mr. Smith is running for
Congress.
Phyllis
Fredland, a home health agency executive director from Pittsburgh,
said the OASIS home health assessment tool and HIPAA requirements greatly
increase her costs. OASIS duplicates other work and contributes to nurses
frustration with the profession. She recommended requiring only the
payment-related questions and increasing home health payments, especially
for resource-intensive patients. Carriers often ask for additional
documentation, which creates high printing costs. They should be required
to get the information electronically and to examine the OASIS record
first before sending a request, since what they want is often in the
record.
Dr.
Robert Urban,
a rural family practice physician and president of the American
Association of Physicians and Surgeons, said government has encroached on
physician autonomy in many ways. Greater use of medical savings accounts
could restore that autonomy, but the regulations currently governing the
accounts are unnecessarily restrictive and appear designed to make them
fail as a viable insurance product.
Dr.
James Pendleton,
a retired psychiatrist from Philadelphia, also recommended a market-based
approach to health care with greater use of medical savings accounts. They
would promote wise spending and allow patients to know prices ahead of
time. He recommended that CMS form a medical savings account task force.
Kay
Bishirjian, with the American Dietetic Association, said that
dieticians should be included in the National Health Service Corps to work
in conjunction with physicians in rural areas to treat chronic diseases
such as diabetes.
Dr.
Dean Cross, a cardiologist from rural New York, said American health
care is in a crisis. Low Medicare fees and new requirements to submit
claims electronically are hurting small, cash-strapped doctors offices.
Different sources within CMS often give different answers to the same
question. Medicare should pay doctors more and reward appropriate care.
Small offices should be exempt from electronic claims requirements.
12:05
p.m. Break
12:30
p.m. resume, Multiple Reviews, Panel one
Anthony
Tirone, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations
(JCAHO)
Washington, D.C.
Mr.
Tirone, director of federal relations, said JCAHO is a not-for-profit
accrediting agency for hospitals, home care, health care networks and
nursing homes. Forty-five states allow "deeming" for at least
some providers, whereby JCAHO accreditation satisfies state requirements.
Areas of difficulty include survey and sampling, data extraction,
coordination of data requirements between government and private groups
and the very slow process for updating regulatory requirements. He
recommended CMS approval of the proposed 2000 Life Safety Code, expanded
deeming, better data sharing, and revision of the data validation process.
HHS regulations are often written in very detailed form, which makes it
difficult for JCAHO to adapt to changing circumstances; the agency needs
either a quicker update process or more broadly written regulations.
Andrew
Webber, National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA)
Mr.
Webber, vice president of external affairs, described NCQAs work
accrediting health maintenance organizations, preferred provider
organizations, provider networks, behavioral health programs, and disease
management programs. NCQAs work is recognized by 24 states as meeting
or exceeding state requirements. Health plans with business in multiple
regions face conflicting requirements and multiple reviews. He recommended
less frequent surveys for good performers, prominently displaying good
ratings to incentivize good performance, using evidence-based performance
standards, allowing adequate lead time on new requirements, standardizing
requirements across government and private programs, expanding the use of
deeming to meet government requirements, and changing the M+C survey cycle
from two to three years to bring it in line with NCQA and make joint
surveys possible.
Ken
Segel, Pittsburgh Regional Health Care Initiative
Mr.
Segel, director, described the work of the initiative, which began in the
late 1980s and includes 40 area hospitals and hundreds of clinicians. The
initiatives goal is to work for "perfect" patient outcomes by
solving problems at the point that care is delivered. The science of
improving complex adaptive systems requires that reformers have few goals,
let parts of a system learn from one another, and provide robust support
for localized learning. The initiative is generating risk-adjusted
outcomes measurements. It bases its review on information that physicians
find useful, which generates better data. Some areas of work have been on
medication errors and infections acquired in healthcare settings. One
burden providers face is the wasteful need to recall and re-issue
medications when a patient is discharged from the hospital to rehab.
People often assume that regulations constrain more than they actually do.
Q&A
The
committee and the panel discussed coordinating care across providers, the
evolution of managed care, and possible changes to the regulation
development process.
1:15
p.m. multiple reviewS, panel two
Dean
Eckenrode, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Mr.
Eckenrode, senior vice president of the centers insurance division,
said multiple governmental and non-governmental entities scrutinize his
health system, making complex and repetitive demands. They all want the
same or similar information on their own timelines, which creates a burden
for the hospital staff. More coordination is needed.
Elizabeth
Concordia, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Ms.
Concordia, president and CEO of two of the centers hospitals,
recommended a standard insurance form and uniform claims submission
guidelines; using "Smart Card" technology to free up the staff
from transcribing information from one form to another at discharge;
reforming the Medicare appeals process; eliminating cost reports for
skilled nursing facilities, since payment is not contingent on them; and
having fewer and better-coordinated surveys that share already assembled
information. The medical center would welcome the opportunity to pilot
test a reform demonstration.
Dr.
Daniel Martich, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Dr.
Martich, an associate professor and medical records director, described
the evolution of the physicians progress note, which is now tied up
with billing concerns and other legal obligations. Frequently changing
guidelines and audits by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) generate
much anxiety among doctors and take away from patient care. He recommended
standardizing medical notes, using pick lists and electronic records,
adopting a "chart it once" rule to eliminate duplicate note
writing, and documenting by exception (reporting only the unusual
results).
The
group recommends eliminating or simplifying cost reports, improving
consistency of rules across CMS regions, getting better guidance to
providers, streamlining the Evaluation and Management (E&M)
documentation guidelines, and coordinating regulations across agencies.
The medical center is willing to pilot test these changes.
Q&A
The
committee and the panel discussed the latitude that HHS has in conducting
demonstration projects, use of Smart Cards to share patient information,
the business relationship between accrediting agencies and those they
evaluate, opportunities to coordinate surveys across agencies, oversight
of accrediting agencies, coordination of regulations as patients move
between different types of providers, and prospects for the use of deeming
to accredit long-term care providers.
2:15
P.M. Adjourn for day, site visits
Meeting
summary prepared by John McCoy, Health Policy Analyst
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
|